Kryon Berlin Tour & Seminar - Berlin, Germany, Sept 17-22 2019 (Kryon Channelling by Lee Carroll)

Kryon Berlin Tour & Seminar - Berlin, Germany, Sept 17-22 2019 (Kryon Channelling by Lee Carroll)
30th Anniversary of the Fall of the Berlin Wall

Council of Europe (CoE) - European Human Rights Court - founding fathers (1949)

Council of Europe (CoE) - European Human Rights Court - founding fathers (1949)
French National Assembly head Edouard Herriot and British Foreign minister Ernest Bevin surrounded by Italian, Luxembourg and other delegates at the first meeting of Council of Europe's Consultative Assembly in Strasbourg, August 1949 (AFP Photo)

EU founding fathers signed 'blank' Treaty of Rome (1957)

EU founding fathers signed 'blank' Treaty of Rome (1957)
The Treaty of Rome was signed in the Palazzo dei Conservatori, one of the Renaissance palaces that line the Michelangelo-designed Capitoline Square in the Italian capital

Shuttered: EU ditches summit 'family photo'

Shuttered: EU ditches summit 'family photo'
EU leaders pose for a family photo during the European Summit at the EU headquarters in Brussels on June 28, 2016 (AFP Photo/JOHN THYS)

European Political Community

European Political Community
Given a rather unclear agenda, the family photo looked set to become a highlight of the meeting bringing together EU leaders alongside those of Armenia, Azerbaijan, Britain, Kosovo, Switzerland and Turkey © Ludovic MARIN

Merkel says fall of Wall proves 'dreams can come true'


“ … Here is another one. A change in what Human nature will allow for government. "Careful, Kryon, don't talk about politics. You'll get in trouble." I won't get in trouble. I'm going to tell you to watch for leadership that cares about you. "You mean politics is going to change?" It already has. It's beginning. Watch for it. You're going to see a total phase-out of old energy dictatorships eventually. The potential is that you're going to see that before 2013. They're going to fall over, you know, because the energy of the population will not sustain an old energy leader ..."
"Update on Current Events" – Jul 23, 2011 (Kryon channelled by Lee Carroll) - (Subjects: The Humanization of God, Gaia, Shift of Human Consciousness, 2012, Benevolent Design, Financial Institutes (Recession, System to Change ...), Water Cycle (Heat up, Mini Ice Ace, Oceans, Fish, Earthquakes ..), Nuclear Power Revealed, Geothermal Power, Hydro Power, Drinking Water from Seawater, No need for Oil as Much, Middle East in Peace, Persia/Iran Uprising, Muhammad, Israel, DNA, Two Dictators to fall soon, Africa, China, (Old) Souls, Species to go, Whales to Humans, Global Unity,..... etc.)
(Subjects: Who/What is Kryon ?, Egypt Uprising, Iran/Persia Uprising, Peace in Middle East without Israel actively involved, Muhammad, "Conceptual" Youth Revolution, "Conceptual" Managed Business, Internet, Social Media, News Media, Google, Bankers, Global Unity,..... etc.)




"The Recalibration of Awareness – Apr 20/21, 2012 (Kryon channeled by Lee Carroll) (Subjects: Old Energy, Recalibration Lectures, God / Creator, Religions/Spiritual systems (Catholic Church, Priests/Nun’s, Worship, John Paul Pope, Women in the Church otherwise church will go, Current Pope won’t do it), Middle East, Jews, Governments will change (Internet, Media, Democracies, Dictators, North Korea, Nations voted at once), Integrity (Businesses, Tobacco Companies, Bankers/ Financial Institutes, Pharmaceutical company to collapse), Illuminati (Started in Greece, with Shipping, Financial markets, Stock markets, Pharmaceutical money (fund to build Africa, to develop)), Shift of Human Consciousness, (Old) Souls, Women, Masters to/already come back, Global Unity.... etc.) - (Text version)

… The Shift in Human Nature

You're starting to see integrity change. Awareness recalibrates integrity, and the Human Being who would sit there and take advantage of another Human Being in an old energy would never do it in a new energy. The reason? It will become intuitive, so this is a shift in Human Nature as well, for in the past you have assumed that people take advantage of people first and integrity comes later. That's just ordinary Human nature.

In the past, Human nature expressed within governments worked like this: If you were stronger than the other one, you simply conquered them. If you were strong, it was an invitation to conquer. If you were weak, it was an invitation to be conquered. No one even thought about it. It was the way of things. The bigger you could have your armies, the better they would do when you sent them out to conquer. That's not how you think today. Did you notice?

Any country that thinks this way today will not survive, for humanity has discovered that the world goes far better by putting things together instead of tearing them apart. The new energy puts the weak and strong together in ways that make sense and that have integrity. Take a look at what happened to some of the businesses in this great land (USA). Up to 30 years ago, when you started realizing some of them didn't have integrity, you eliminated them. What happened to the tobacco companies when you realized they were knowingly addicting your children? Today, they still sell their products to less-aware countries, but that will also change.

What did you do a few years ago when you realized that your bankers were actually selling you homes that they knew you couldn't pay for later? They were walking away, smiling greedily, not thinking about the heartbreak that was to follow when a life's dream would be lost. Dear American, you are in a recession. However, this is like when you prune a tree and cut back the branches. When the tree grows back, you've got control and the branches will grow bigger and stronger than they were before, without the greed factor. Then, if you don't like the way it grows back, you'll prune it again! I tell you this because awareness is now in control of big money. It's right before your eyes, what you're doing. But fear often rules. …

Friday, July 6, 2012

Fears Church of England vote on women bishops has begun to unravel

Church could see women ordained as bishops by 2014, but critics warn draft legislation contains a compromise too far

The Guardian, Lizzy Davies, Friday 6 July 2012

Vote on women bishops – Rachel Treweek, archdeacon of Hackney, says:
 'I think it is very unlikely that I would press the "yes" button because of that
 place of integrity'

The Venerable Rachel Treweek, archdeacon of Hackney, will leave east London for York tomorrow with mixed feelings and a heavy heart. This weekend's gathering of the General Synod was supposed to be historic: the moment at which the Church of England would finally, after decades of struggle and division, pass legislation that permitted women to become bishops.

Instead of rejoicing, however, Treweek and many other supporters of the cause now find themselves in a very peculiar position. The legislation they fought so hard for is due to be presented for final approval and, if it is passed, the church could see women consecrated to the episcopate by 2014.

But Treweek is hoping for an adjournment and is dreading the possibility that the final vote will be held. Because, if it comes down to it, she will vote against.

"I cannot tell you – even sitting here now, I can feel it – how painful that feels," she says, in the low-lit quiet of St Anne's church in Hoxton. "I feel I have to hold the line of my integrity. It would be very easy to say: 'Oh, let's all just vote in favour and get this through.'… But I think it's very unlikely that I would press the yes button because of that place of integrity."

Until May, the draft legislation on female bishops met with the approval of people such as Treweek. A two-clause measure that sought to open the episcopate to women at the same time as providing for those who remain adamantly opposed to the idea, it had been approved by 42 of 44 dioceses (although not, to her chagrin, Treweek's own: the diocese of London voted against).

Although a compromise, it was viewed by many to be the least bad one in a church where fudges are a standard vehicle for change.

Then it all started to unravel. In May, the House of Bishops made two amendments to the legislation, one of which supporters say would enshrine discrimination against women in law. It is this clause – the now infamous 5(1)c – which prompted a group of senior female clergy to write to members of the General Synod expressing their "deep dismay" and hope that an adjournment would be reached that would allow for the offending passage to be looked at again.

"I've spent quite a long time trying to make myself feel it was voteable for so that we could just get on with things," said the Rev Dr Miranda Threlfall-Holmes, chaplain at University College, Durham, of 5(1)c. "For the last few weeks, I've been really very upset – prone to bursting into tears.

"But I feel a bit calmer now. I've realised I just can't do that; I haven't got that dilemma any more. It's just completely unacceptable to institutionalise discrimination against women in that way."

The objections to clause 5(1)c are complex. Supporters of female bishops had accepted long ago that provisions should be made for those evangelicals and Anglo-Catholics who, for different reasons, view a female bishop as a theological impossibility. The draft legislation allowed for parishes to request alternative bishops.

But, according to a formidable coalition of senior female clergy, the legislation as it now stands is a compromise too far which in effect legitimises discriminatory beliefs.

Clause 5(1)c stipulates that a new code of practice being drawn up should include official guidance on how to ensure that "the exercise of ministry by those [alternative] bishops and priests will be consistent with the theological convictions" of the parish which has objected to a woman.

Its defenders say that this wording is merely making explicit what was already implicit in the draft legislation. But others says it is enshrining in law the very prejudices against which supporters of female bishops have battled so long. It would, they say, create a two-tier system in which not only women, but men who ordained women or who had themselves been ordained by women, would be considered second rate.

Not everyone, even fellow supporters of the cause, agrees with them; they have been accused of nit-picking at a crucial stage, and exposing the Church of England to yet more censure for its slow-moving decision-making.

But those opposing the amended clause are undeterred. "I've had a certain amount of emotional blackmail from some people ringing me up and saying: 'You've got to vote for it because otherwise what will the general public think?'" says Threlfall-Holmes.

"But the sense I've had from the [Durham] students and also from people in the pews … is very much that the last thing they will understand is if we vote for discriminatory legislation."

Treweek, who admits she was "quite naive" about the future of women in the church when she was ordained in 1994, two years after legislation allowing female priests was passed, says it is partly because of that that she feels so strongly about women bishops now.

"It has taken this long and I didn't think it would take this long and I don't want us to ever have to revisit this," she says. "I want to get it right now. I don't want to get something in legislation which means in 10 years' time we're having to come back to this.

"This is the moment for getting it right. And if that means it has to take longer, then that's where I'm sitting at the moment."

If, as is looking increasingly likely, there is an adjournment in the debate on Monday, the legislation would go back to the House of Bishops in September and would return to Synod at a later date. Hilary Cotton, strategy co-ordinator of campaign group Women and the Church (Watch), says she would like to see the bishops ask senior female clergy for their opinion on the wording of future amendments.

If there is not an adjournment and the vote goes ahead, Cotton says she will take no pleasure in either result.

"It's a joyless position at this stage and that's a tragedy," she says, sitting with Sally Barnes, also of Watch, in the cafe at St Martin in the Fields in central London. Barnes shows off pictures of Watch's tea towel, emblazoned with the words: "A woman's place is in the House … of Bishops."

She has, like many people, been campaigning on the issue of women in the Church of England for decades – in her case, since 1979. "And we were nearly there," says Cotton.

New female dean appointed

A woman has been confirmed as the new dean at the city's minster. The Very Rev Vivienne Faull, 57, was previously the first woman appointed to a cathedral deanery when she became dean at Leicester in 2000. She is expected to take up her post at York Minster in September.

Faull said she was delighted to have been nominated and added: " It is of course daunting to move from one of the smallest to one of the largest cathedrals." The dean, who studied at St Hilda's College, Oxford, has risen to become one of the leading female clergy in the church since her ordination in 1994. She has been a member of the General Synod representing deans of cathedrals since 2004.

There are only three other female deans running cathedrals in England.



"The Recalibration of Awareness – Apr 20/21, 2012 (Kryon channeled by Lee Carroll) (Subjects: Old Energy, Recalibration LecturesGod / CreatorReligions/Spiritual systems  (Catholic Church, Priests/Nun’s, Worship, John Paul Pope, Women in the Church otherwise church will go, Current Pope won’t do it),  Middle East, Jews, Governments will change (Internet, Media, Democracies, Dictators, North Korea, Nations voted at once), Integrity (Businesses, Tobacco Companies, Bankers/ Financial Institutes, Pharmaceutical company to collapse),  Illuminati (Based in Greece, Shipping, Financial markets, Stock markets, Pharmaceutical money (fund to build Africa to develop)), Shift of Human Consciousness, (Old) Souls, Women, Masters to/already come back, Global Unity.... etc.)

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.