guardian.co.uk,
Peter Walker, Monday 1 October 2012
Britain's
biggest professional body for psychotherapists has instructed members that it
is unethical for them to attempt to "convert" gay people to being
heterosexual, formalising a policy change long demanded by rights groups.
The British Association for Counselling and Psychotherapy has written to its near-30,000
members to inform them of the new guidelines. The letter says the BACP
"opposes any psychological treatment such as 'reparative' or 'conversion'
therapy which is based upon the assumption that homosexuality is a mental
disorder, or based on the premise that the client/patient should change his/her
sexuality". The body adds that it recognises World Health Organisation
policy that says such therapies can cause severe harm to an individual's mental
and physical health.
The
statement, drawn up by the board of governors, ends: "BACP believes that
socially inclusive, non-judgmental attitudes to people who identify across the
diverse range of human sexualities will have positive consequences for those individuals,
as well as for the wider society in which they live. There is no scientific,
rational or ethical reason to treat people who identify within a range of human
sexualities any differently from those who identify solely as
heterosexual."
Conversion
therapies are mainly associated with evangelical Christian groups in the US. It
was long presumed that the vast majority of UK counsellors and psychotherapists
recognised that these were widely discredited. But a 2009 survey of 1,300
therapists, psychoanalysts and psychiatrists found more than 200 had attempted
to change at least one patient's sexual orientation, with 55 saying they were
still offering such a therapy.
The BACP
guideline change followed a case in which a devoutly Christian psychotherapist,
Lesley Pilkington, was struck off the members' list for offering conversion therapy to an undercover journalist. Her appeal was turned down in May.
Philip
Hodson, a psychotherapist and BACP spokesman, said the organisation had
previously presumed its more general guidelines on equality and acting in a
client's best interest would preclude members offering such therapy, but
tightened up the rules after the Pilkington case.
He said:
"To me, as a therapist, it seemed inconceivable that someone who had been
trained and made accountable could act in that way. I was shocked rigid that a
member was practising conversion therapy, which I thought only happened in
wackier parts of America."
The BACP
could have acted sooner, Hodson added: "There is an argument to say that
we haven't looked at this when we might have done. Every single year we look at
our basic and key messages, and I'm afraid this one did not rise to the top at
this stage. We thought it was covered by other things."
While
Pilkington's actions emerged in early 2010 the guidelines could not be changed
until her appeal was completed, Hodson said: "You can't establish a formal
position once a case is going on – you have to wait until a case is over."
The other
main professional body for British psychotherapists, the UK Council for
Psychotherapy, issued similar guidance to members in early 2010, shortly after
the Pilkington case emerged.
The picture
is complicated further by the fact that while the BACP and UKCP have strict
accreditation and ethical guidelines, under law anyone can call themselves a
psychotherapist or a counsellor. In 2007 the Labour government announced plans
for statutory regulation of the professions, which would prevent this. The idea
has since been dropped by the Department for Health.
On Monday
the governor of California, Jerry Brown, signed off a law banning any
"conversion" therapies on those aged under 18.
Related Articles:
Is Psychiatry Reconsidering Its Evaluations of Spirituality?
About the Challenges of Being a Gay Man – Oct 23, 2010 (Saint Germain channelled by Alexandra Mahlimay and Dan Bennack)
“ ... You see, your Soul and Creator are not concerned with any perspective you have that contradicts the reality of your Divinity – whether this be your gender, your sexual preference, your nationality – or your race, ethnicity, religious beliefs, or anything else.The only identity that has any fundamental or lasting relevance to your Soul is your Divinity. Any other way you may label or identify yourself is transitory. It changes from one incarnation to the next. ..."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.