guardian.co.uk,
Patrick Wintour, political editor, Thursday 5 January 2012
Nick Clegg addresses the Liberal Democrats' autumn conference in Birmingham last September. Photograph: Darren Staples/Reuters |
Nick Clegg
has used his first intervention of the new year to map out a crackdown on
"crony capitalism", vowing to take action against company taxavoidance, excessive executive pay and irresponsible capitalism.
The deputy
prime minister said that millions of voters were "quite rightly
angered" by the fact that a "wealthy elite of large businesses"
was using an army of accountants to get out of paying a fair share of tax.
"They
basically see paying tax as an optional extra, they pick and choose the taxes
you pay. There should be a general rule that you can't play the system, you
can't abuse the system."
He hailed a
report commissioned by the Treasury from Graham Aaronson QC and published in
November, which backs the introduction of a narrowly focused but general tax
avoidance rule on the main direct taxes – income, capital gains, corporation
and petroleum revenue taxes – as well as national insurance contributions.
Clegg said:
"I very much hope – and I'm not going to write George Osborne's budget –
we can make progress on that in the budget. We have got to make sure the tax
system is fair."
Clegg made
his remark in the knowledge that the Treasury was willing to press ahead in
this area.
A Commons
report last month criticised "specific and systemic" failures at
Revenue and Customs that allowed big companies to avoid paying what was owed.
David Hartnett, the agency's top official, is stepping down this month.
Clegg also
promised action on executive pay: "It's Liberal Democrats who've led the
debate on clamping down on bankers' bonuses and we must be just as tough this
year in the bonus season that's coming up, as we were last year, if not more
so."
He added
that he was determined to clamp down on "crony" or
"irresponsible" capitalism, phrases coined by the Conservative MP
Jesse Norman.
The MP for
Hereford and South Herefordshire, sees crony capitalism as a threat when there
is insufficient competition, a factor leading to businesses becoming detached
from the public interest.
Options
under consideration include giving shareholders a binding vote on pay, and
putting employees on company remuneration committees.
Shareholders
in the UK have been entitled to an advisory vote on directors' remuneration
reports since 2002. But the level of dissent against the reports in FTSE350
companies remains low – it stood at about 5-6% during the first four years
after the vote was introduced.
It is
estimated that 40% of shares are now held overseas, raising doubts as to
whether shareholders will ever see the issue as a priority.
The
business secretary, Vince Cable, would also like to see bonuses deferred for up
to three years to ensure that improved performance is genuine.
While Cable
has ruled out setting limits on compensation, he is also looking at stiffening
reporting requirements for listed companies, including requiring publication of
how much each board member receives.
The CBI has
opposed a binding shareholder vote and a worker on boards. It stated: "We
believe remuneration committees should be bolstered by widening the pool of
non-executive directors that serve on them, and giving them greater scope to
reduce or withhold rewards in cases of poor performance."
The CBI has
said remuneration schemes should avoid complexity. A single aggregate figure,
that includes share options and bonuses, for individual directors' pay, should
be included in annual reports.
Patrick Wintour
Related Article:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.