|
David
Cameron arrives at 10 Downing
Street in central London on August 27,
2013
(AFP/File, Carl Court)
|
LONDON —
Britain will not take military action against the Syrian regime before UN
inspectors report back on evidence of chemical weapons attacks, according to a
motion published by the government Wednesday that is set to be put to a
parliamentary vote.
Lawmakers
are due to vote on Britain's response to the attacks on Thursday but any
military action will require a further vote of parliament's lower House of
Commons after the UN experts confirm their findings in the coming days.
"Before
any direct British involvement in such action a further vote of the House of Commons
will take place," the motion said.
The
opposition Labour party had threatened to vote against Thursday's motion unless
lawmakers were promised a second vote on the basis of the UN evidence -- which
had left Prime Minister David Cameron facing possible defeat in his bid for
targeted strikes against the Syrian regime.
Along with
the United States and France, Britain claims Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's
government is responsible for horrific poison gas attacks believed to have left
hundreds dead near Damascus a week ago.
The Syrian
government strongly denies this and blames opposition fighters for the attacks.
Cameron
will on Thursday try to convince lawmakers that targeted strikes would punish
the Assad regime for its alleged use of chemical weapons and deter any further
attacks.
The
parliamentary motion, released by Cameron's office, said "every
effort" should be made to secure approval from the United Nations Security
Council before any military action goes ahead.
Britain had
already sought backing from the council on Wednesday, submitting a draft
resolution to its five permanent members calling for action to protect Syrian
civilians.
But British
ministers concede that a UN resolution supporting military action is extremely
unlikely as permanent members Russia and China fiercely oppose a strike against
Assad.
|
Britain's
Foreign Secretary William Hague
leaves Downing Street in central London
on
August 28, 2013 (AFP, Carl Court)
|
Expectations
of a Western military assault rose as the United States ruled out any chance of
securing a UN resolution, and British Foreign Secretary William Hague said the
international community had a responsibility to act even if the Security
Council could not agree.
A UN
spokesman suggested that the world body's team in Damascus will not report back
until at least Friday.
British
lawmakers will be asked on Thursday to back "a strong humanitarian
response" that "may, if necessary, require military action that is
legal, proportionate and focused on savings lives by preventing and deterring
further use of Syria's chemical weapons".
Cameron has
recalled lawmakers from their summer break for the marathon debate, in which he
is set to propose targeted military strikes to "degrade" the regime's
chemical weapons capability.
He will
also attempt to persuade lawmakers that any strikes would not drag Britain into
the wider conflict.
Some MPs
are reluctant to back British military involvement, haunted by their experience
of the Iraq war.
In 2003,
parliament gave then prime minister Tony Blair a mandate to join the US-led
offensive in Iraq on the basis of allegations that dictator Saddam Hussein had
weapons of mass destruction.
The weapons
never materialised and Britain became embroiled in the war for years.
"The
PM is acutely aware of the deep concerns in the country caused by what happened
over Iraq," a spokeswoman for Cameron said.
"That's
why we are committed to taking action to deal with this war crime -- but taking
action in the right way, proceeding on a consensual basis."
|
Women with
Syrian flag colours
painted on their faces take part in a
demonstration in
London on August 28,
2013 (AFP, Carl Court)
|
Deputy
Prime Minister Nick Clegg, whose Liberal Democrats are the junior coalition
partners of Cameron's Conservatives, sent an email to his MPs late Wednesday
headlined: "This is not Iraq."
"This
is not about regime change," Clegg wrote, urging Lib Dems to back the
motion.
"This
is about upholding international and humanitarian law and deterring the use of
chemical weapons to protect innocent people from being murdered in future by
brutal dictators."
A YouGov
poll for The Sun newspaper showed that Britons overwhelmingly oppose the use of
British missiles against military sites in Syria.
Hundreds of
anti-war protesters gathered outside Cameron's Downing Street residence on
Wednesday, chanting slogans including "Hands off Syria".
"I'm
here today because even though Syrian people are suffering massively at the
hands of Assad and his brutal regime, I think a Western intervention would be
essentially throwing petrol on the fire," protester Nathan Rodgers told
AFP.
"We've
seen over the last decade that Western intervention into countries in turmoil
only leads to more killing."
Related Articles:
Archangel Michael and Sanat Kumara Comment on the Truth of the Syrian Gas Attacks - New
The Declaration of World Peace - Archangel Michael
(Via Steve Beckow), Oct 8, 2012
"Recalibration of Free Choice"– Mar 3, 2012 (Kryon Channelling by Lee Caroll) - (Subjects: (Old) Souls, Midpoint on 21-12-2012, Shift of Human Consciousness, Black & White vs. Color, 1 - Spirituality (Religions) shifting, Loose a Pope “soon”, 2 - Humans will change react to drama, 3 - Civilizations/Population on Earth, 4 - Alternate energy sources (Geothermal, Tidal (Paddle wheels), Wind), 5 – Financials Institutes/concepts will change (Integrity – Ethical) , 6 - News/Media/TV to change, 7 – Big Pharmaceutical company will collapse “soon”, (Keep people sick), (Integrity – Ethical) 8 – Wars will be over on Earth, Global Unity, … etc.) - (Text version)
The last one is the best. For thousands of years on this planet, Human Beings have warred with each other. If you take a look at the reasons they warred with each other, you will quickly see there aren't any good ones - land, resources, greed. Those are not reasons. That is a description of old energy. Those are not reasons. Reasons would be perhaps defense against an aggressor. But what if there is no longer the consciousness of the aggressor?
When I appeared in my partner's life more than 20 years ago, I said to him privately that the first messages we're going to give will be unbelievable. There would be laughter. We told him that Human nature and consciousness itself would change, and that the seeds of peace would be planted and there would come a time where there is no more war. Indeed, the laughter was great because humans look at history and they see patterns based on an absolute energy called Human Nature. "Impossible! There always has to be war. There always has been. Therefore, there always will be." This is you, in a box, in a black and white potential, where you can only see the black and white of what is and the black and white of what has been. You have no idea the shades of color that are there in your consciousness and the beauty of the love of God.
North Korea is on the edge of change, as we told you it might be. What did this require? The death of the old energy, and I want you to watch this take place. The advisors of the young leader are going to do their best to pull him back into an old energy. This free choice of his will be far different than his father, for he sees some color. Watch for these things. They'll take longer than you want, but it is the beginning of the beginning.
You'll see a fresh unification of South America sooner than not, for what is going to take place potentially this year in Venezuela. You'll see Iran changing. We have no clock. These are the potentials. These can change with free choice. These are not prophecies. This is a reality shift, dear ones, so number eight becomes the propensity not to war again. This is what Humans are going to want. This is what governments are going to want. There is a wisdom factor that will begin to happen on the planet that is grander than what you think is possible. For when you look at government, what do you think about? You see dysfunction, and there is an axiom that says the more people that try to do something together, the worse it gets. It all settles to the lowest common denominator. I'm telling you even those things are going to become old energy concepts. Instead, you're going to watch wisdom become the top potential.
I have no clock. I cannot tell you when. I can just tell you it is in the works, and there will be the seeds of it for you to observe soon - right now, in every single of the eight categories I showed you.
There are those who will say, "Well, Kryon, you're doing a lot more predictions than you used to." I want to tell you what's going on, dear one. I am not predicting anything. I am just telling you what's already there in the potential soup of your reality. That's what Humans are doing on this planet, and for those who believe this communication, you should breathe a sigh of relief and say, "It's about time." ….”