Newspapers
urge prime minister to restore Britain's reputation for free press after
holding of Guardian journalist's partner
The Guardian, The Observer, Jamie Doward, Saturday 24 August 2013
The detention and subsequent criminal investigation into the partner of a Guardian journalist threatens to undermine the position of the free press around the world, the editors of several northern European newspapers have warned.
The editors
of leading European newspapers have written to David
Cameron over the detention
of the partner of a Guardian journalist.
|
The detention and subsequent criminal investigation into the partner of a Guardian journalist threatens to undermine the position of the free press around the world, the editors of several northern European newspapers have warned.
In an open letter to David Cameron published in today's Observer, the editors of Denmark's
Politiken, Sweden's Dagens Nyheter, Norway's Aftenposten and Finland's
Helsingin Sanomat describe the detention of David Miranda, the partner of the
Guardian's Glenn Greenwald, as harassment.
They say
that the "events in Great Britain over the past week give rise to deep
concern" and call on the British prime minister to "reinstall your
government among the leading defenders of the free press".
Miranda was
detained by the Metropolitan police for nine hours last Sunday as he was
passing through Heathrow on his way to Brazil.
Greenwald
has broken a series of stories about the US intelligence agencies based on
material leaked by the National Security Agency whistleblower Edward Snowden.
The editors
describe a free press as crucial to holding governments and their intelligence
agencies to account. They write: "We are surprised by the recent acts by
officials of your government against our colleagues at the Guardian and deeply
concerned that a stout defender of democracy and free debate like the United
Kingdom uses anti-terror legislation in order to legalise what amounts to
harassment of both the paper and individuals associated with it."
They add:
"It is deeply disturbing that the police have now announced a criminal
investigation" and they warn that "the implication of these acts may
have ramifications far beyond the borders of the UK, undermining the position
of the free press throughout the world".
The
letter's publication comes as it emerged that Scotland Yard will face legal
action over its use of anti-terrorism powers to question people at airports
unless it hands over the results of investigations into alleged misuse by its
officers.
The Independent
Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) has said it has given the force a seven-day
ultimatum to reveal its findings into outstanding complaints about the use of
the tactic following its "continued refusal" to investigate.
The
watchdog said it was supervising 18 investigations into the use by the Met of
Schedule 7 powers, which allow officers to detain passengers for up to nine
hours without needing reasonable suspicion of involvement in terrorism.
The IPCC
said it ordered the Met in February to "investigate the rationale for
stopping and questioning people under Schedule 7". The force agreed to
investigate two months later, following the threat of legal action, but then
refused to hand over the resulting investigation documents to the watchdog, an
IPCC spokesman said.
Scotland
Yard said it was "working hard" to agree a procedure for dealing with
investigations with the IPCC and and that legal action had so far been
"unnecessary".
A Met
spokesman said: "The Metropolitan Police Service recognises the IPCC's
role in scrutinising complaints related to Schedule 7 stops and has been
working hard to agree a procedure for dealing with such investigations that is
acceptable to all stakeholders. As a result of these efforts, legal action has
been unnecessary. We hope to be in a position to finalise a way forward with
the IPCC in the future."
Meanwhile
it has emerged that the US government's efforts to determine which highly
classified materials Snowden took from the NSA have been frustrated by the
former contractor's sophisticated efforts to cover his digital trail.
The
Associated Press reported that the US government investigation is examining
whether Snowden was able to defeat safeguards established to deter people
looking at information without proper permission by deleting or bypassing
electronic logs.
In July,
nearly two months after Snowden's earliest disclosures, the NSA director, Keith
Alexander, declined to say whether he had established what Snowden had
downloaded or how many NSA files he had taken with him.
The latest
disclosure undermines the Obama administration's assurances to Congress and the
public that the NSA surveillance programs cannot be abused because its spying
systems are so aggressively monitored and audited.
Fears about
government snooping are now a major concern for internet companies, which are
examining measures to restrict external surveillance of people's online
activity.
The
Internet Engineering Task Force, a body that develops internet standards, has
proposed a system in which communication between websites and browers would be
shielded by encryption. The proposals, which are at an early stage, would make
it harder for governments, companies and criminals to eavesdrop on people as
they browse the web.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.