The Guardian, Alan Travis, home affairs editor, Saturday 17 March 2012
Margaret Thatcher and Rupert Murdoch in the US in 1991 – they had secretly met 10 years previously before Murdoch's successful bid for Times Newspapers. Photograph: John Mantel/Rex Features |
A secret
meeting between Rupert Murdoch and Margaret Thatcher cleared the way for News International to buy the Times and Sunday Times in 1981, Thatcher's privatefiles reveal.
A long note
– marked by her press secretary, Bernard Ingham, as "commercial in
confidence" – of the Sunday lunch at Chequers on 4 January, three weeks
before the first cabinet committee discussion of the Murdoch takeover, shows
the meeting was held at his request.
Thatcher
gave the meeting no publicity and instructed that the note should not leave No
10 Downing Street; the media tycoon later gave the impression in the newspaper's
own history that he had no contact with the prime minister ahead of
Conservative approval of the purchase.
The Ingham
note makes clear that Murdoch first tried to establish some political empathy
with Thatcher by praising Ronald Reagan's new administration before explicitly
briefing her on his bid and future plans for Times Newspapers, including taking
on the unions, introducing new technology and reducing the workforce by 25%.
Murdoch
followed up the lunch with a handwritten "thank you" note two weeks later
– "My dear Prime Minister" – telling her that "the field has
contracted down to only two or three of us" and that the Times owners, the
Thomson family, would "make up their minds in the next day or so".
This direct
personal lobbying was critical, as the government had the power to block his
acquisition by referring the bid to the Monopolies and Mergers Commission
because Murdoch already owned the Sun and the News of the World. The
government's subsequent refusal to do so paved the way for the creation of what
is easily the largest newspaper group in Britain. Its market share was about
28% at the time, but its financial strength has helped it grow to the point
where it accounts for about 37% of all newspaper copies sold.
The
decision was one to be taken personally by the trade secretary, then John
Biffen. However, when the matter was first discussed at the crucial cabinet
economic strategy committee on 26 January, the recently released minutes show
that Thatcher opened the discussion by highlighting the exemption under the
Fair Trading Act 1973 that would allow Murdoch's bid to avoid a referral.
Thirty
years later, the circumstances surrounding Murdoch's purchase of the Times
titles came back into focus as his News Corporation bid for full control of
BSkyB. Negotiations between News Corp and the culture secretary, Jeremy Hunt,
led to a similar outcome – with the minister proposing to approve the merger in
lieu of a full referral to the Competition Commission, in return for an
agreement to spin out Sky News.
But the
deal collapsed in furore that followed the revelation that Milly Dowler's phone
had been targeted by the News of the World.
David
Cameron's first meeting with a media owner after he became prime minister in
May 2010 was with Rupert Murdoch, who entered No 10 by the back door. Two
months later Murdoch's News Corp launched its bid for Sky, and the proprietor
met Cameron in July 2010. This meeting was not initially disclosed when Cameron
first published a list of meetings with media owners and newspaper editors in
July last year.
The
disclosure of the secret Chequers lunch in the 1981 Thatcher papers held at the
Churchill archives centre, Cambridge and now released after 30 years, flatly
contradicts the account in the official history of the Times that says the two
scarcely knew each other and "had no communication whatsoever during the
period in which the Times bid and referral was up for discussion".
The author,
Graham Stewart, sources this to an interview with Murdoch. The official history
suggests that the newspaper tycoon relied instead on the columnist Woodrow
Wyatt to plead his case.
The Ingham
note says that Murdoch spent much of the Chequers lunch voicing his
"favourable impressions" of the embryonic Reagan administration and
offering to arrange a meeting for her with a group of "New Right"
politicians during her impending visit to New York.
Ingham says
that before the meeting he had tried to check with the trade department on the
reported 10 bids but was told there was no further information beyond what had
been in the papers because Times Newspapers were being very secretive.
Murdoch
said he had made a "nominal bid" for all the Times titles, all of
which would be retained, in return for which he would meet all staff redundancy
costs on the condition there was a 25% cut in "overall manning
levels". He added that he couldn't move to "optimum manning and use
of new technology in one fell swoop" but foreshadowing the later move to
Wapping stressed the "inevitability of progressing gradually".
He then
listed his rival bidders. He dismissed Lonrho and Robert Maxwell as unlikely to
impress either Thomson, unions or journalists. He said Sir James Goldsmith was
only likely to bid for the Sunday Times, which had been profitable, but that he
was in a stronger position as he was willing to buy the Times as well. The
Times journalists' own bid was also dismissed as "unlikely to carry much
conviction". He left out, however, the most significant rival, Lord Rothermere,
owner of the Daily Mail.
Murdoch
said that he was risking £50m of News Group's resources in the deal and that
such an amount "could finish us".
Ingham
claims that Thatcher did nothing more than "wish him well in his bid"
and noted the need to improve Fleet Street staffing levels and to introduce new
technology.
The later
cabinet committee minutes confirm Thatcher's role in the discussion but also
that the trade department's accountants had advised that only in the case of
the Times was it "clear-cut" that it was not economic as a going
concern.
Many people
who wanted the MMC to block Murdoch's takeover believed that the Sunday Times
would return to financial health, and the papers appear to confirm that view. Until
recently the Sunday title was highly profitable.
Related Article:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.