Deutsche Welle, 3 May 2014
Some crises
profoundly change the world order - the eurozone crisis led to a European
banking union, for example. Could the crisis in Ukraine have a lasting effect
on the European Union, like in energy policy?
When it
comes to energy policy, EU member states have not been keen to liaise with
other members of the bloc. After Fukushima, when Germany decided to quickly
phase out nuclear energy, Germany's neighbors weren't involved in the
decision-making process - they were simply left to take note of the policy
change, as the issue of energy is largely in the hands of individual member
states.
But the
crisis in Ukraine could see European member states move toward more energy
integration. The debate kicked off after Poland's Prime Minister Donald Tusk
coined the term "energy union" - and the discussion about more
independence from Russian oil and gas imports has picked up pace ever since.
Tusk had
also brought up the idea of common EU energy purchases from Russian energy
giant Gazprom, but an energy union could even go further than that. According
to Guntram Wolff, head of the Brussels-based think tank Bruegel, huge
investments into European infrastructure would kill two birds with one stone:
It would make sense for Europe, and also have sufficient symbolism as an end to
the bloc's austerity policy. It would be a good way to revive people's interest
in the European project, Wolff added.
More
integration to anger Moscow?
Tusk's idea
of an EU energy union has not only met with approval from experts and European
parties campaigning for elections on May 25, but it's also been praised by
numerous heads of state and government. EU energy commissioner Günther
Oettinger wants to present a proposal by June that could include expansion of
pan-European grids for natural gas, as well as a uniform price for Russian gas.
Oettinger (left) and Tusk are pushing for a joint energy union |
According
to Jan Techau, who heads the think tank Carnegie Europe, the crisis in Ukraine
will spur integration on the energy market. "It might not lead to a
uniform energy policy, but it will definitely lead to massive investments in
order to become less dependent on Russia," he said.
However, he
doesn't expect only Europe's energy policy to change in the long run. Europe's
understanding of how far the bloc can push in terms of cooperation with its
neighbors to the east could change, as well.
The crisis
in Ukraine destroyed Europeans' illusions that they could form agreements with
the east without experiencing counter-pressure from Russia. In the aftermath of
the crisis, Europe has had to take power politics into account - much more than
it had done before. "Russia has shown us that power politics, politics of
strength, military threats, blackmailing - all these things - are going to be
political instruments," Techau said.
A rift
within Europe
There's not
been much talk about the EU's Common Security and Defense Policy (CSDP) lately
- but some of the larger political parties' election programs have hinted at
building up a European army. Techau is rather skeptical on that point.
"It's a dream that won't be possible for a long time." Quite the
contrary: He argues that the CSDP is one of the losers in the Ukraine crisis.
"NATO has gotten a boost, but Europe hasn't."
While
people from the Baltic States, Poland and Scandinavia are worried for their
safety - people are quite outspoken about their fear of Russia - others such as
Germans, French and Dutch have been more relaxed. And so are Mediterranean
people. At the moment, Europe has been speaking with a single voice, said Janis
Emmanouilidis, director of the European Policy Centre in Brussels. However, as
the conflict drags on, it will become more complicated to maintain unity, he
said.
According
to Techau, after the 2003 war in Iraq, the rift within Europe dividing the
continent in its east and south could be felt quite clearly. It's not just
about perceived threats, but also about financial interests, he said: "The
EU pays two-thirds of aid under its European Neighborhood Policy to the south,
one-third goes to the east. Mediterranean countries such as Spain, Italy and
Greece don't want money to be pulled from the Mediterranean to be given to the
east."
Former German Chancellor Schröder has maintained close ties to Putin |
This rift
does not work in Germany's favor. With its close economic and political ties to
Russia, Berlin struggles with its promise to provide foreign policy leadership.
"Germany is expected to lead, to bring about some calm, to reassure safety
for eastern partners. But it's difficult for the Germans, who have always had a
slight weakness for Russia, and who are closely watched because of that,"
Techau said.
But
according to Germany's partners, Berlin is sending mixed signals - quite the
contrary to its firm position in the euro crisis. Germany could end up losing
out in the Ukraine crisis, both on the economic front as well was in terms of
EU political influence.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.