Formula One
chief relieved at end of trial but questions paying $100m settlement as 'judge
more or less said I was acquitted'
Bernie Ecclestone. The F1 boss is worth £3bn-£4bn but the defence denied claims that he had bought his freedom. Photograph: Willi Schneider/Rex |
The Formula One chief, Bernie Ecclestone, has declared himself "a bit of an
idiot" for paying a £60m settlement to bring an end to his bribery trial.
The
president and chief executive of Formula One agreed with German prosecutors on
Tuesday to pay the record sum to end his trial, a district court in Munich
confirmed. The defence has denied accusations that he had bought his freedom.
The Formula
One boss went on trial in Munich in April over allegations that he bribed a
former German banker as part of the sale of a major stake in the motor sport
business eight years ago.
Although
slightly lighter in the pocket, given Ecclestone's worth is estimated at about
£3bn-£4bn, he was nonetheless relieved that he could put this period of his
life finally behind him.
Ecclestone,
83, told PA: "The bottom line is it's been three and a half years of
aggravation, travelling, meeting lawyers, and God knows what else, so it is
good it is out of the way.
"This
trial has been going on for two days a week and it was going to go on until
October. When you're trying to run businesses it's not easy trying to resolve
things when you're dealing with lawyers.
"In
the end what has happened today is good and bad; the good is the judge more or
less said I was acquitted, and they [the prosecution] really didn't have a
case.
"So I
was a bit of an idiot to do what I did to settle because it wasn't with the
judge, it was with the prosecutors.
"Anyway,
it's done and finished, so it's all right. I'm contented, it's all fine.
"This
now allows me to do what I do best, which is running F1.
"Another
three months out would have been bad. I've been working weekends to catch up
with what I've been missing during the week.
"I've
not really noticed, but it's probably taken its toll a little bit."
The Munich
court said in a statement that $99m (£59m) would be paid to the German treasury
and a further $1m to a German children's hospice charity. The money will be
paid within a week, it added, after which the trial will officially be
abandoned.
"The
abandonment is neither a 'deal' nor a 'settlement', even less so a 'buying
out,'" said Ecclestone's defence team in a joint statement. Prosecutors
said they had based their decision partly on the defendant's age and
willingness to cooperate.
Ecclestone
was accused of having given Bayern Landesbank's chief risk officer, Gerhard
Gribkowsky, $44m in 2006 in order to ease the sale of the bank's share to a
company that had guaranteed to keep Ecclestone as chief executive.
Throughout
the trial, Ecclestone admitted paying the money but denied it was a bribe,
saying he paid it to silence Gribkowsky who had threatened to report him over
irregularities in his tax affairs. Gribkowsky was sentenced in 2012 to eight
and a half years for tax evasion, breach of duty and accepting bribes.
In a
statement explaining its decision to abandon proceedings, the court said it had
"considerable doubts" that Ecclestone knew Gribkowsky had held the
position at the German state bank at the time of the alleged bribe.
"Accordingly,
a prosecution of the accused due to bribery is not probable as things
stand," the court said, despite admitting that all evidence in the case
had not yet been heard.
Last week
Ecclestone's legal team informed the court that he was willing to pay €25m
(£19.8m) to Bayern LB in a separate settlement. The bank, which had been
seeking €400m in damages from Ecclestone, had rejected an earlier offer of €50m
in 2012, the Süddeutsche Zeitung reported.
German law
provides for some criminal cases to be settled with smaller punishments, such
as fines, though the size of the payment in the Ecclestone case has led some to
question a system that in effect favours rich defendants.
A paragraph
in the German criminal code allows for trials to be ended under conditions that
are "appropriate for resolving the public interest in a prosecution,"
as long as the gravity of wrongdoing does not outweigh this.
In
practice, wealthy defendants have in the past used this clause to buy their way
out of criminal trials. But no one has ever paid so high a sum as has been
agreed with Ecclestone.
The
agreement, which his defence lawyers said kept his presumed innocence intact,
means Ecclestone is able to continue unchallenged at the helm of the
multibillion-pound business, which he is credited with building up over the
past four decades.
If he had
been sentenced, Ecclestone, a leading figure in the sport since the 1970s,
could have faced up to 10 years in prison and would most likely have been
forced to step down.
During the
trial, Ecclestone handed over the day-to-day running of Formula One to his
chief legal officer, Sacha Woodward-Hill. Now Ecclestone is once again free to
take control, with no sign of the veteran sports magnate voluntarily giving up
any of his considerable power.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.