Rivka
Feldhay barred from a meeting of Israeli and German scientists by prime
minister for critical stance
guardian.co.uk,
Associated Press in Jerusalem, Thursday 6 December 2012
Binyamin Netanyahu is on a visit to Germany. Photograph: Sean Gallup/ Getty Images |
Israel has barred a dovish Israeli academic from taking part in a science symposium in Berlin on Thursday that was part of prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu's visit to Germany, drawing renewed charges that his government has little tolerance for dissent.
An official
travelling with Netanyahu said professor and human rights expert Rivka Feldhay
was banned from a meeting of Israeli and German scientists because the prime
minister did not want to allow the participation of an Israeli "who
tarnishes the name of Israeli soldiers and pilots".
Feldhay
signed a petition in 2008 that supported Israeli soldiers who refused to serve
in Palestinian territories, the official said.
Feldhay
said in an email that she had travelled to Berlin at the invitation of the
Israeli embassy in Germany.
After her
arrival, the embassy notified Feldhay that National Security Council head
Yaakov Amidror "refused to confirm my participation since I am a critical
of the government of Israel".
In her
subsequent communications with government officials, Feldhay said she was
attacked as "an enemy of the state".
"I am
amazed that the Council of National Security has found nothing more important
in terms of Israeli security than myself," she said. "It fits other
types of regimes than democracy, a regime [where] there is no distinction
between opposition to the government and enemies of the state."
Opposition
figures have accused Netanyahu and his political allies of trying to stifle
dissent and pluralism through a string of bills brought before parliament.
One of the
measures, assailed by Israel's attorney general and put on hold, would sharply
restrict funding for dovish groups.
Others,
passed into law, require non-Jewish new citizens to pledge a loyalty oath to a
"Jewish and democratic state". They also deny state funding to groups
that mourn what Palestinians call "the catastrophe" of Israel's 1948
creation and punish Israelis who advocate boycotting Jewish settlements.
The
government rejects claims that dissent is being quieted, citing Israel's
raucous press and independent courts.
Critics
counter that the government has tried to muzzle those institutions as well,
saying proposed legislation would undermine the independence of the supreme
court, the sole check on the Israeli legislature.
Journalists
have warned of an anti-media blitz through political appointments to the
country's public broadcasting system, sidelining prominent critics and an
amended libel law that could put a chill on investigative reports.
Related Articles:
Palestine dominates Israeli-German talks
Nobel peace laureates call for Israel military boycott over Gaza assault
The Jewish-Palestinian Declaration (1997)
Palestine dominates Israeli-German talks
Nobel peace laureates call for Israel military boycott over Gaza assault
The Jewish-Palestinian Declaration (1997)
“… Let us talk about the swords: When you hear the word sword, the first thing that occurs to you is battle. The Bridge of Swords is a battle and we told you that as well. Swords are metaphoric and they mean many things, so let us describe the things we mean them to say to you.
Number one: They are indeed a weapon in a battle. There is a battle coming. "Kryon, does that mean there's going to be a war?" Potentially, yes. Right now we will tell you that the Middle East cooks itself. You've noticed, haven't you? What do you know about the Middle East, dear one? Let's start examining things for a moment. What energy did you grow up in? What was the energy of the Middle East? In the '40s, what was the energy? With the establishment of the state of Israel, you built a wall of hate, both sides. The wall was so thick that the children of both sides were taught to hate one another as soon as they were able to understand the language. They were told who their enemies were. Now, where were you then?
Some of you weren't here yet. By the time you arrived, in your youth, were you aware of the Middle East? Not particularly. "What's the hatred about?" you might ask. What if I told you it's about a family feud? Two sons of a Jewish master are involved. One founded the Arabs and one remained a Jew. They don't want to hear this, but they are all Jews. (Don't tell them this.)
If you look at the lineage, it's pretty obvious and yet it's a complete and total set-up for either solution or war. The set-up would have this world ending in a conflagration that would have been brought about by this hatred. That's in the prophecy of Nostradamus and your scripture, but it is no longer the prophecy of the planet. Yet the hatred still exists. The hatred is as great today as it was then, but where was all the terrorism 40 years ago? It was isolated.
Those in Israel and Palestine and surrounding areas took the brunt of it, but now it's seemingly everywhere - and you're worried. Why would this be? The answer is that the old energy was happy to have this hatred contained, for it would keep it going and never involve outsiders. Outsiders tend to bring unwanted light to the party. Suddenly, the whole earth is involved and can see the entire scenario before them. The old guard wants war, just like all the eons before them. The ones on the bridge are holding the light and showing the earth how to cross. Even many younger ones in Israel and Palestine and Iran are holding light! It's all around the old guard and they are furious, for they are losing the "battle of hatred." …”
Number one: They are indeed a weapon in a battle. There is a battle coming. "Kryon, does that mean there's going to be a war?" Potentially, yes. Right now we will tell you that the Middle East cooks itself. You've noticed, haven't you? What do you know about the Middle East, dear one? Let's start examining things for a moment. What energy did you grow up in? What was the energy of the Middle East? In the '40s, what was the energy? With the establishment of the state of Israel, you built a wall of hate, both sides. The wall was so thick that the children of both sides were taught to hate one another as soon as they were able to understand the language. They were told who their enemies were. Now, where were you then?
Some of you weren't here yet. By the time you arrived, in your youth, were you aware of the Middle East? Not particularly. "What's the hatred about?" you might ask. What if I told you it's about a family feud? Two sons of a Jewish master are involved. One founded the Arabs and one remained a Jew. They don't want to hear this, but they are all Jews. (Don't tell them this.)
If you look at the lineage, it's pretty obvious and yet it's a complete and total set-up for either solution or war. The set-up would have this world ending in a conflagration that would have been brought about by this hatred. That's in the prophecy of Nostradamus and your scripture, but it is no longer the prophecy of the planet. Yet the hatred still exists. The hatred is as great today as it was then, but where was all the terrorism 40 years ago? It was isolated.
Those in Israel and Palestine and surrounding areas took the brunt of it, but now it's seemingly everywhere - and you're worried. Why would this be? The answer is that the old energy was happy to have this hatred contained, for it would keep it going and never involve outsiders. Outsiders tend to bring unwanted light to the party. Suddenly, the whole earth is involved and can see the entire scenario before them. The old guard wants war, just like all the eons before them. The ones on the bridge are holding the light and showing the earth how to cross. Even many younger ones in Israel and Palestine and Iran are holding light! It's all around the old guard and they are furious, for they are losing the "battle of hatred." …”
9. It can be no other way—simply, this is the physics that governs life in this universe. As Earth continues apace into successively higher planes, nothing with low vibrations in any form—physical bodies, subversive plans, theft, dishonesty, unjust laws and imprisonment, bigotry, cruel customs and deeds—can survive.
10. Moving on, no, it will not be quite like religions being “totally discarded and replaced by universal laws in the Golden Age.” When the truths come forth that science and spirit are one and the same and that religious dogmas were originated by early leaders of church and state to control the masses, people whose consciousness has risen beyond the constraints of third density will adhere to the spiritual aspects of their respective religions and the devised, controlling aspects will fall by the wayside.
11. One of the truths to come forth is that Zionism, which by dark intent has been made synonymous with Judaism, actually is a bellicose political movement within the Illuminati, and its aim for more than six decades has been to create conflict and instability in the entire Middle East. Zionists, who have wielded powerful influence within and behind major governments and their military forces, do NOT represent the Jewish peoples in Israel or anywhere else. And, like all other Illuminati factions, they have been committed to that cabal’s goal of global domination.
12. Although Semites are of diverse national origins and religions, the Zionists have been successful in convincing many that “anti-Semitic” is exclusively prejudice against the Jewish peoples and opposition to Israel’s right to defend itself from its “enemies.” By means of that blatant distortion, they obtained not only world sympathy, but also massive defense funding from Israel’s allies, most especially the United States, all of which served to increase the Illuminati’s vast profits from their industrial-military machine.
13. In addition to controlling the masses through dogmatic teachings, religions have served the dark purpose of divisiveness to such an extent that it resulted in centuries of trauma and bloodshed. Witness the Crusades, wars between Catholics and Protestants, pogroms against Jews, executions of “blasphemous” individuals who refused to “recant.” (Read More …)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.