Coffee
chain's move comes on eve of report by MPs expected to condemn use of overseas
subsidiaries to reduce tax burden
guardian.co.uk,
Simon Neville, Sunday 2 December 2012
 |
| Starbucks admits is reputation has been damaged by the revelations that it paid £8.5m in taxes on its profits since arriving in the UK in 1998. Photograph: Jeff Gilbert/Alamy |
Starbucks
has agreed to review its UK tax arrangements following months of criticism over
its use of overseas subsidiaries which led to it paying no corporation tax in
the last three years.
The
decision comes a day before the public accounts committee issues a report that
is expected to be highly critical of the coffee chain, and as George Osborne
prepares to announce anti-tax avoidance measures in Wednesday's Autumn
statement.
The company
admitted its reputation has been damaged by the revelations that it paid £8.5min taxes on its profits since arriving in the UK in 1998 and is in negotiations
with HM Revenue & Customs.
It said:
"We have listened to feedback from our customers and employees, and
understand that to maintain and further build public trust we need to do more.
As part of this we are looking at our tax approach in the UK.
"The
company has been in discussions with HMRC for some time and is also in talks
with The Treasury."
On
Wednesday, the chancellor is likely to announce plans to tackle tax avoidance,
which has seen Starbucks, Google, Amazon, Ikea and eBay, among others, accused
of not paying their fair share of taxes in the UK.
Osborne
told BBC 1's Andrew Marr show on Sunday: "I think you can do two things.
One is you can enforce the taxes we have got and I am going to be announcing
tomorrow extra investment in the part of the Inland Revenue that tackles tax
avoidance by multinational companies. Second, you make sure internationally we
have the right rules."
Starbucks
insists it pays the correct amount of tax, however, MPs were highly critical of the company's use of European subsidiaries which led to the company making
near-continuous losses in the UK, despite sales of £3bn since 1998.
Questions
were also raised after board members of the US parent company told analysts and
investors in the past that the UK had been profitable.
It added:
"Starbucks is committed to the UK for the long term and we have invested
more than £200m in our UK business over the past 12 years. Starbucks has
complied with all the tax laws in this country but has regretfully not been as
profitable as we would have liked."
The company
continues to make losses by purchasing the coffee beans from its Swiss
subsidiary, at a 20% premium. It then pays a 4.7% levy to its Dutch offices for
the coffee roasting process, the recipes and the use of the Starbucks brand.
The firm
can then pay lower rates of corporation tax on its profits, including just 12%
in Switzerland.
But
Starbucks is thought to be changing its payment structure to the Dutch and
Swiss bases, meaning it could make a profit.
A 6%
premium had previously been charged by the business in the Netherlands. But
this was negotiated down to 4.7% by Starbucks and the Dutch authorities. A
similar negotiation could take place with HMRC.
High rents
in the UK have also helped to erode profitability.
Along with
bosses from Amazon and Google, Starbucks' chief financial officer, Troy
Alstead, faced hostile questioning from the public accounts committee last
month.
Members of
the committee accused the companies of avoiding taxes and said they did not
believe that Starbucks had not made a profit in the UK.
The
politicians were equally disapproving of HMRC and said tax inspectors had given
multinationals an easy ride when it came to paying corporation tax.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.