Authorities
sent letter to whistleblower Anders Kompass, who faces dismissal from UN for
leaking report into claims of child abuse by French troops in Africa
The Guardian, Sandra Laville, Friday 1 May 2015
French
authorities sent a letter of thanks to the UN whistleblower who passed on details
of the alleged of abuse of children by its troops in Africa, the Guardian can
reveal.
The
official, Anders Kompass, has been suspended by the UN and faces dismissal for
what the organisation says is a “breach of protocols” in releasing a
confidential internal UN document.
Sources
close to the case say Kompass, director of field operations for the Office of
the High Commissioner for Human Rights in Geneva, disclosed the report to the
French because of the UN’s failure to act quickly to stop the abuse identified
in their own internal report.
Hinting
that the allegations represented just a fraction of what had taken place, a UN
spokesman said on Friday “it is possible, it’s horribly possible” that more
allegations of sexual abuse of children by French and other soldiers in the
Central African Republic could come to light.
As Kompass
fights for his job, it emerged on Friday that the French were grateful for the
disclosure of the report detailing interviews with children as young as eight
or nine who describe sexual abuse at the hands of its peacekeepers.
The French
mission was not under the direct control of the UN, but run by the French
authorities. The abuse was identified by the UN in an internal report
commissioned after reports on the ground that children were being abused.
The letter
from the French expressed gratitude for Kompass’s actions. It read: “Dear
director, Thank you for the information you have shared with my government
concerning Operation Sangaris in the Central African Republic.
“The information
is receiving the full attention of the authorities. Given the seriousness of
the allegations and the necessity to check the veracity of them, it was
immediately decided to launch a judicial inquiry which will determine what
subsequent steps will be taken, including possible criminal proceedings. In
addition, a command disciplinary investigation has been ordered without delay,
under the responsibility of the defence staff.”
The letter,
signed by the French permanent representative in Geneva, was sent to Kompass at
his UN office on 30 July last year, shortly after he sent the report to the
French mission.
It is
understood the letter was logged in the OHCHR official correspondence register
on 5 August – suggesting his employers were aware of his actions.
Eight
months later, however, Kompass was told he was being suspended and was under
investigation for breaching strict protocols on the release of confidential
information.
The UN has
failed to say when or if it officially passed on the report detailing the
sexual exploitation of the children to the French for them to take action.
On Friday
the OHCHR repeated its assertion that Kompass was not a whistleblower but had
“breached strict protocols.”
The UN
spokesman said: “This investigation concerns the manner in which confidential
information, and especially the identities of child victims and witnesses, as
well as of the investigators, was communicated to external actors in possible
breach of strict rules that exist to protect victims, witnesses and
investigators.”
On
Thursday, the French president, François Hollande, promised to show “no mercy”
if the allegations against French troops were found to be true.
As the
investigation by the French continued, Bea Edwards, of the Government
Accountability Project, which provides advocacy for whistleblowers, said the UN
was wrong to say Kompass was not a whistleblower.
Under their
own protocols, she said, his actions were a whistleblower disclosure to law
enforcement about abuse by troops authorised by UN Security Council Resolution
2127 to deploy to the CAR.
“His
transmission of criminal allegations to French authorities meets the conditions
permitting the external disclosure of wrongdoing,” said Edwards. “These include
that the allegations represented violations of international law, as well as an
imminent and ongoing danger to the public health and safety and that there was
no personal benefit accrued to the whisteblower.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.